Though biofuels have been touted as a viable substitute for fossil fuels, a recent report from the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has advocated energy efficiency and conversation measures rather than biofuels as a viable solution to fossil fuels.
Biofuels have been generating controversy recently. Earlier this year they were cited as one of the causes of increase in food prices around the world. It was estimated that larger amounts of agricultural lands are getting diverted to the cultivation of corn for use in biofuels rather than food. Moreover, the greenhouse gas emissions reduction benefits of biofuels have also come under increasing attack in the past few months as scientists debate the true environmental costs of producing biofuels. While it was earlier believed that biofuels have lesser greenhouse gas emissions than fossil fuels, the bigger picture (according to some studies) shows that the production of biofuels has a greater greenhouse cost because of the conversion of virgin land, forested land and even scrubland into cropland for biofuels. Furthermore the related refining and transportation costs of biofuel also increase their greenhouse effect.
The recent report from the OECD raises the same concerns on the greenhouse compatibility of biofuels. It will be interesting to see where the future of biofuels is headed. As oil-prices rise, there is heightened interest in alternatives and much hope has been banked on biofuels. But with the new doubts about the eco-friendliness of biofuels, it is unclear how big a role biofuels will play in solving the energy conundrum.